Practicing Theory -- Teaching, Technology & Textuality

Home

English
Dept.

Writing
Center

Course Description

English 5011 (Studies in Rhetoric and Composition) is a graduate seminar that is usually offered once a year as part of the study option in rhetoric and composition in the English Department's M.A. program.

In Spring 1999, this seminar will study the so-called conflict between theory (theoria) and practice (praxis) in the field of rhetoric and composition.  How does theory inform and shape our institutional practices of writing, reading, and teaching? In what ways do these practices actually subvert and dismantle theories that define what we do as writers and readers? How does technology and its contributions to writing and reading further inform or complicate the theory-practice divide? And in what ways does technology function as theory and as practice?

To answer such questions—and to raise others—this seminar will survey (briefly) the history of rhetorical theory, focusing in particular on 20th-century statements about rhetoric and the discipline we know as rhetoric and composition.    While the general focus of the seminar is on the longstanding dispute between theory and practice, our more specific focus will be on teaching, technology, and textuality—how they interrelate and inform each other, as well as how they problematize each other.  Each one of these concepts has in play various theories and practices, which often conflict and collide with each other or, just as often, these differences remain hidden and unexamined.  At the same time, terms like teaching, technology, and textuality are fundamental constructs of our educational, interpretive, and consumerist cultures.  The dispute between theory-practice, therefore, provides an opportunity to re-think the matrix of teaching, technology, and textuality and the ways in which this matrix is cohesive or divisive.

As such, this course is not a theory course per se, nor is it a methods course as commonly conceived. Rather, this course is somewhere in between (to invoke a spatial metaphor) those initiatives (perhaps even somewhere above), for "Practicing Theory" calls into question both terms as static concepts. What we find in this questioning—and where we find ourselves—will be the topics of our discussion throughout the semester, which we will all address more formally in the online anthology of articles that this seminar will publish later in the semester.

"Practicing Theory: An Anthology of Articles"

 

updated -- january 11, 1999
r.l. beebe
(cfrlb@eiu.edu)