To compare your attitude toward science with the views of
2000 American adults tested in 1985 by Jon D. Miller, head of
the Public Opinion Laboratory at Northern Illinois University,
answer the following questions ( true or false ).
1. Some numbers are especially lucky for some people. ( 40 )
2. Because of their knowledge, scientific researchers have a
power that makes them dangerous. ( 50+ )
3. The positions of the sun, moon, planets, and stars have at
least some influence on human affairs (astrology). ( 40 )
4. It is likely that some of the unidentified flying objects
(UFOs) that have been reported are really space vehicles
from other civilizations. ( 43 )
5. Space shots have caused changes in our weather. ( 40+ )
6. Science tends to break down people's ideas of right and
wrong. ( over 30 )
Of the 2000 test takers, the % answering "true" is in
parentheses after each question.
Ideally, the numbers should all be zero (0) since all the
statements are false.
Assuming the sample was a fair cross section of adult
Americans, what do these numbers show about attitudes toward
science ?
Compared with them, how well did you do ?
In another poll reported in The American Biology Teacher ( editorial, May '89 )
The sample being polled consisted of high school life
science and biology teachers !
A Gallup poll in 1984 indicated that
52% of American teens believed that astrology
works.
Consider some of the evidence and some pointed
questions:
After the San Francisco earthquake in October 1989,
Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen found that
Nancy Reagan's much-publicized astrologer had been home
in San Francisco.
"What I want to know is why a woman who
told the president the precise moment to sign a treaty
couldn't see an earthquake coming," he wrote. Alas, she
said, that kind of prediction is best left to an earthquake
astrologer.
( "In Brief," Skeptical Inquirer, Spring 1990, p. 239. )
Should people who believe in astrology be allowed to teach
science in public schools, practice medicine, or hold public
office ?
Astrology columns appear in over 1200
U.S. newspapers.
Does this mean that astrology
should be taken seriously ?
If astrologers claim that your personality is dictated by
the attraction of the planets at the moment of your birth,
how do you account for the fact that the gravitational pull
of the delivering obstetrician far outweighed that of the
planets involved ?
Leyden note:
Let's say there are 6 billion people on the planet with an average life span of 60 yrs (far too high for most of the world) --- so that means 274,000 people were born each day -- or about 1/2 billion each month who have the same "sign."
Would you vote for such a person if you had the
choice ?
== popular tradition with little or no scientific evidence ?
How do you tell the difference ?