wait time -- "the sounds of silence"
students: increase number of responses
increase length of responses
unsolicited / appropriate answers increase
confidence increases (voice inflection decreases)
students propose more experiments
more creative answers
present evidence to support answers
less dependent on teacher clues
shift to more child-child talk
teachers:
ask a higher level question ( Bloom's Taxonomy )
make fewer discourse errors
more flexible in their responses
change expectations of students
* discovered a second wait time when teacher is noncommital in response because ...
+ student talk -- comes -- in bursts ...
+ "is it safe to respond?" ...
+ evaluation raises hell with trust ...
+ if teachers have the power to dole out rewards, then she also has the power to give punishments
...
* with low reward schedules ...
there is less evaluation ...
creative answers increase ...
there is less demand on teacher's time
* hi reward schedules ...
make kids focus on "what she wants" and not the investigation at hand
* deferred judgement ... ( vs. concurrent judgment )
... keeps the critical kids from eating the creative ones
* kids are
eye watchers, and with hi rewards schedules are afraid to do anything 'til your winking and nod gives them the okay
* there are places
for classroom rewards ... give pertenient rewards or be neutral ... don't be ambiguous; do you reward the answer or the effort . . .
* hi rewards: kids behave
competitvely ...
hand waving ...
"oooohs ... me, me, me ...
"i " have a shot a the reward .. . (so i hope you fail)
* short wait times and hi rewards ...
are negative to activity-based science programs since they undermind confidence ...
act as distractors ..
prompts termination of search ... and
urges kids to accept hte first answer ...
surpress innovation for fear of being wrong ...
teacher become the source authority not nature
* if you want
students to think exactly like you ...
then try these phrases that will produce such compliance:
-- isn't it?
-- don't you think that ...
-- why did you ...
-- right? ( it would be academic suicide to disagree )
-- yes, but .. the art of mimicking students get them to agree with you
science is built on concept of people questioning other people's ideas ...
conflict is important to the expansion of ideas schools try to get all kids to agree ...
do you have classroom inquisition or conversations?
¥ kids need to feel safe in questioning
¥ feel free in speculation they must mess about and explore a problem from all angles
let them === this takes time ( you have l80 school days to do it )
6/25s/95